Triple

T37774630
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gustaw E941650 entity
Predicate equivalentFormInLatin P60629 FINISHED
Object Gustavus NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gustavus | Statement: [Gustaw, equivalentFormInLatin, Gustavus]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: equivalentFormInLatin
Context triple: [Gustaw, equivalentFormInLatin, Gustavus]
  • A. equivalentEnglishForm
    Indicates that two expressions share the same meaning in English, serving as equivalent linguistic forms.
  • B. correspondsToLatinWord chosen
    Indicates that one element is the equivalent or matching term of another element in Latin.
  • C. equivalentFormInPortuguese
    Indicates that one linguistic form has an equivalent expression or representation in Portuguese.
  • D. equivalentFormInHungarian
    Indicates that one linguistic form has an equivalent expression or translation in Hungarian.
  • E. equivalentFormInSwedish
    Indicates that one entity is the corresponding equivalent form of another entity when expressed in the Swedish language.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ee4431881908f87e8892a9f39f3 completed May 3, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbb9e8108c8190ae1c7940b1677e95 completed May 6, 2026, 10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fbb141605c8190b9c27d70352522db completed May 6, 2026, 9:23 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.