Triple
T37768099
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wolfgang |
E941469
|
entity |
| Predicate | isTrappableVillain |
P189205
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Wolfgang, isTrappableVillain, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isTrappableVillain Context triple: [Wolfgang, isTrappableVillain, true]
-
A.
hasVillain
Indicates that one entity is the villain or primary antagonist associated with another entity.
-
B.
isTypeOfVillain
Indicates that one entity is classified as a particular type or category of villain in relation to another entity.
-
C.
fullyIntroducedAsAntagonistIn
Indicates that an entity is completely and explicitly presented in a work as an antagonist within the specified context or narrative.
-
D.
canSpareAntagonist
Indicates that one entity is able and willing to refrain from harming, defeating, or otherwise eliminating an opposing or hostile entity.
-
E.
isCentralAntagonist
Indicates that an entity serves as the primary opposing force or main villain driving conflict against the protagonist or central characters.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ee3251881909bb4451aad50752b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbb9e8108c8190ae1c7940b1677e95 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbb141605c8190b9c27d70352522db |
completed | May 6, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fbb9e69b7481909beaf8264d87c5e5 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 10 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:19 p.m.