Triple

T37736669
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bìyán Lù E940294 entity
Predicate hasLaterCommentaryBy P22246 FINISHED
Object Hakuin Ekaku NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hakuin Ekaku | Statement: [Bìyán Lù, hasLaterCommentaryBy, Hakuin Ekaku]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLaterCommentaryBy
Context triple: [Bìyán Lù, hasLaterCommentaryBy, Hakuin Ekaku]
  • A. hasCommentaryOn chosen
    Indicates that one entity provides commentary, explanation, or evaluative remarks about another entity.
  • B. hasCommentaryIn
    Indicates that an entity is discussed, analyzed, or annotated within a specific commentary work or source.
  • C. hasCommentaryForm
    Indicates that one entity exists in, or is associated with, a commentary version or format of another entity.
  • D. isSubCommentaryOn
    Indicates that one commentary functions as a subordinate or dependent commentary on another commentary, elaborating or commenting on it rather than standing alone.
  • E. commentatedFor
    Indicates that one entity provided live or recorded commentary or analysis for an event, performance, or broadcast on behalf of another entity (such as an organization, channel, or client).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76edefd048190a32212c5c3919531 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fff9b126b4819085a4cf8791d388d1 completed May 10, 2026, 3:21 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fff8f913a881908d3b7e490d92631f completed May 10, 2026, 3:18 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.