Triple

T37729216
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bertrand Morane E940109 entity
Predicate appearsInRemakeAs P198153 FINISHED
Object Bertrand Morane (American remake character) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bertrand Morane (American remake character) | Statement: [Bertrand Morane, appearsInRemakeAs, Bertrand Morane (American remake character)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appearsInRemakeAs
Context triple: [Bertrand Morane, appearsInRemakeAs, Bertrand Morane (American remake character)]
  • A. appearsInRemakeOf
    Indicates that an entity appears in a work that is a remake of another original work.
  • B. remakeAppearsIn
    Indicates that a remake of a work is featured, shown, or included within a particular context, such as a collection, series, or medium.
  • C. remakeOfFilmStarring
    Indicates that one film is a remake of another film in which a specified actor or set of actors starred.
  • D. remakeOfFilmBy
    Indicates that one film is a remake created by a specific filmmaker or director of an earlier film.
  • E. filmRemakeOf
    Indicates that one film is a remake of another earlier film, typically retelling the same or a very similar story.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76edefd048190a32212c5c3919531 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fecd0a732c819097bdd3eb69b6158c completed May 9, 2026, 5:58 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fecc0318d481908b5b20598a76a9fe completed May 9, 2026, 5:54 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fecd091abc8190872974de731a80fa completed May 9, 2026, 5:58 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.