Triple

T37701925
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tono E939085 entity
Predicate spellingStandard P81382 FINISHED
Object does not conform to standard Spanish orthography for Toño LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: does not conform to standard Spanish orthography for Toño | Statement: [Tono, spellingStandard, does not conform to standard Spanish orthography for Toño]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: spellingStandard
Context triple: [Tono, spellingStandard, does not conform to standard Spanish orthography for Toño]
  • A. spellingStyle
    Indicates the particular orthographic convention or system of spelling that is used or preferred in a given context.
  • B. spellingStatus chosen
    Indicates the correctness or condition of the spelling of a given text or term.
  • C. usesStandardOrthographyOf
    Indicates that one entity writes or represents language according to the standard orthographic system defined for another entity.
  • D. spellingStability
    Indicates the degree to which the spelling of a word or term remains consistent over time or across different uses.
  • E. hasTypicalSpelling
    Indicates that one form is the standard or commonly accepted spelling of another form.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eda6ae48190b3111071eeacc038 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbb084760c8190a1554985d3c3cb7a completed May 6, 2026, 9:20 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fbadf3cb548190ba3b7514f76b790a completed May 6, 2026, 9:09 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.