Triple

T37701924
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tono E939085 entity
Predicate conventionality P191625 FINISHED
Object nonstandard LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: nonstandard | Statement: [Tono, conventionality, nonstandard]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: conventionality
Context triple: [Tono, conventionality, nonstandard]
  • A. conventionFor
    Indicates a relationship where something serves as a standard, rule, or customary practice governing how another thing is done, represented, or interpreted.
  • B. associatedConvention
    Indicates a relationship where something is linked or connected to a particular convention (such as an event, standard, or formal gathering).
  • C. reasonForConvention
    Indicates the underlying purpose, cause, or motivation that led to holding a particular convention.
  • D. governingConvention
    Indicates that one entity is the formal agreement, treaty, or convention that provides the authoritative rules or framework governing another entity or activity.
  • E. conventionSigned
    Indicates that an entity has formally agreed to and signed a specific convention or treaty.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eda6ae48190b3111071eeacc038 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fce28d6c3081908bf76f5db63ecf68 completed May 7, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fce12d2f08819082134b5eb3db6a24 completed May 7, 2026, 6:59 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fce28a74508190aab36551094e8226 completed May 7, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.