Triple
T37691932
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Austrian legislative election 2019 |
E938827
|
entity |
| Predicate | liberalPartyVoteShare |
P189779
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 8.1% |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 8.1% | Statement: [Austrian legislative election 2019, liberalPartyVoteShare, 8.1%]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: liberalPartyVoteShare Context triple: [Austrian legislative election 2019, liberalPartyVoteShare, 8.1%]
-
A.
LiberalDemocratVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes received by the Liberal Democrat party in a given election or electoral unit.
-
B.
LiberalPopularVote
Indicates that the Liberal party received a high or majority share of the popular vote in an election.
-
C.
NewDemocracyVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes received by the New Democracy party in a given election or electoral context.
-
D.
LiberalSeatsWon
Indicates the number of parliamentary or legislative seats won by the Liberal party in an election.
-
E.
CooperativeCommonwealthFederationPopularVoteShare
Indicates the proportion of total votes cast that went to the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation in a given election.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eda6ae48190b3111071eeacc038 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbca6c066c8190a1599202f341417f |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbc8ee04f08190977b7ad70fc85896 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:04 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fbc993caa881908c16c3e21efaeef9 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 11:07 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.