Triple

T37689536
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Aspelta E938465 entity
Predicate contemporaryEgyptianDynasty P192538 FINISHED
Object 26th Dynasty of Egypt NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 26th Dynasty of Egypt | Statement: [Aspelta, contemporaryEgyptianDynasty, 26th Dynasty of Egypt]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: contemporaryEgyptianDynasty
Context triple: [Aspelta, contemporaryEgyptianDynasty, 26th Dynasty of Egypt]
  • A. currentDynastyFoundedYear
    Indicates the year in which the currently ruling dynasty was established or came into power.
  • B. hasFirstDynasty
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or ruled by a specified first (earliest) dynasty in a given succession or historical sequence.
  • C. secondDynasty
    Indicates that an entity belongs to, is associated with, or occurred during the second dynasty in a given dynastic sequence.
  • D. pharaohReign
    Indicates that a specified individual ruled as pharaoh over a particular realm during a given time period.
  • E. majorPharaoh
    Indicates that the subject is recognized as a principal or highly significant pharaoh in relation to the object (such as a period, dynasty, or context).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ed881408190bc62a969530a4a53 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd0d0ba5c48190bddb3f0e6637544c completed May 7, 2026, 10:07 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd0c4324a8819086c90adf46216e0e completed May 7, 2026, 10:03 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fd0d0aebac8190868a7714ddb4f1fd completed May 7, 2026, 10:07 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.