Triple
T37664416
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Elder Guardian |
E937788
|
entity |
| Predicate | colorComparedToGuardian |
P191933
|
FINISHED |
| Object | paler |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: paler | Statement: [Elder Guardian, colorComparedToGuardian, paler]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colorComparedToGuardian Context triple: [Elder Guardian, colorComparedToGuardian, paler]
-
A.
hasColorGuard
Indicates that an entity includes, is associated with, or features a color guard unit (e.g., a performance or ceremonial flag-bearing group).
-
B.
coGuardianOf
Indicates that two or more entities share joint legal or protective responsibility as guardians over the same dependent entity.
-
C.
colorStability
Indicates how consistently an entity’s color remains unchanged over time or under varying conditions.
-
D.
colorUse
Indicates that one entity uses, applies, or is associated with a particular color in its appearance, design, or representation.
-
E.
hasTeamColorContrast
Indicates that there is a sufficient visual contrast between the colors associated with a team and another relevant color set (such as opponents, background, or interface elements).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed6df7c8190b018e5baea716ceb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcef654d588190b29ecc76678d1aa0 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcecdb97f48190b382b7d13be92dc0 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fcef636dfc819085cf91323f2e4edd |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.