Triple
T37664248
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dark Prismarine |
E937785
|
entity |
| Predicate | toolToMine |
P188645
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pickaxe |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pickaxe | Statement: [Dark Prismarine, toolToMine, Pickaxe]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: toolToMine Context triple: [Dark Prismarine, toolToMine, Pickaxe]
-
A.
toolIn
Indicates that one entity is a tool or instrument used in or associated with another entity or context.
-
B.
toolForBestMining
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the most suitable or effective tool to use for mining the other entity.
-
C.
isToolOf
Indicates that one entity functions as an instrument or means used by another entity to perform tasks or achieve goals.
-
D.
miningWithoutToolEffect
Indicates that an entity performs a mining action without using a tool, and this predicate captures the resulting effect or outcome of that tool-less mining.
-
E.
toolDescribed
Indicates that one entity provides a description or explanation of a tool associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed6df7c8190b018e5baea716ceb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbb9e8108c8190ae1c7940b1677e95 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 10 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbb141605c8190b9c27d70352522db |
completed | May 6, 2026, 9:23 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.