Triple
T37661542
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Small End Islands |
E937727
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDownfall |
P40768
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 0.0 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 0.0 | Statement: [Small End Islands, hasDownfall, 0.0]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDownfall Context triple: [Small End Islands, hasDownfall, 0.0]
-
A.
downfall
chosen
Indicates the process or event by which an entity experiences a significant decline, ruin, or loss of power, status, or success.
-
B.
fellIn
Indicates that one entity moved downward, typically due to gravity or loss of support, and ended up inside or within the bounds of another entity or location.
-
C.
eventuallyFellAfter
Indicates that one event or state occurred at some point in time after another event or state, emphasizing that the later occurrence was not immediate but happened eventually.
-
D.
fellWith
Indicates that one entity fell at the same time as, or in conjunction with, another entity.
-
E.
fellOn
Indicates that one entity moved downward, typically due to gravity, and came to rest on the surface of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed6df7c8190b018e5baea716ceb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcdf2394748190b35cead3e208447d |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcdbe344ec8190a0471911952f4b82 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:37 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.