Triple

T37657071
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SQL Server error numbers E937628 entity
Predicate rangePurpose P189772 FINISHED
Object 0-999 system-defined errors LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 0-999 system-defined errors | Statement: [SQL Server error numbers, rangePurpose, 0-999 system-defined errors]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rangePurpose
Context triple: [SQL Server error numbers, rangePurpose, 0-999 system-defined errors]
  • A. accessPurpose
    Indicates that one entity uses or accesses another entity specifically for a defined purpose or intended use.
  • B. hierarchyPurpose
    Indicates that one entity serves as the purpose, goal, or intended function of another within a hierarchical structure.
  • C. purpose
    Indicates that one entity exists, is done, or is used in order to achieve, support, or serve the goal, function, or intended outcome of another entity.
  • D. tagPurpose
    Indicates the intended role, function, or use associated with a given tag in a particular context.
  • E. servicePurpose
    Indicates that one entity serves as the purpose, goal, or intended function for which another entity (typically a service) exists or is provided.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ed6df7c8190b018e5baea716ceb completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fbca6c066c8190a1599202f341417f completed May 6, 2026, 11:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fbc8ec03ac8190a757563f96fab283 completed May 6, 2026, 11:04 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fbc9d0854c8190aa00093274afebb8 completed May 6, 2026, 11:08 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.