Triple
T37656958
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SQLAgentReaderRole |
E937626
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPermissionType |
P83854
|
FINISHED |
| Object | read-only |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: read-only | Statement: [SQLAgentReaderRole, hasPermissionType, read-only]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPermissionType Context triple: [SQLAgentReaderRole, hasPermissionType, read-only]
-
A.
supportsPermissionType
chosen
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, allowing, or being configured with a specified type of permission.
-
B.
securityTypePermitted
Indicates that a particular type or category of security is allowed or authorized within a given context or system.
-
C.
hasAuthorType
Indicates that an entity is associated with an author characterized by a specific role, category, or type.
-
D.
hasMemberType
Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with members belonging to a specified type or category.
-
E.
hasPermit
Indicates that an entity possesses an official authorization or license granting it permission to perform a specific activity or hold a certain status.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed6df7c8190b018e5baea716ceb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fea1f5d8c481908dc3351dc9ecef7f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fea06b6fe0819095bf4c1bc9809927 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:48 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.