Triple
T37642497
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Protective Services Bureau |
E936650
|
entity |
| Predicate | oftenReportsTo |
P196645
|
FINISHED |
| Object | chief security officer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: chief security officer | Statement: [Protective Services Bureau, oftenReportsTo, chief security officer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: oftenReportsTo Context triple: [Protective Services Bureau, oftenReportsTo, chief security officer]
-
A.
reportsSubmittedTo
Indicates that one party has delivered or filed reports to another designated recipient or authority.
-
B.
mayReportTo
Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to have a reporting relationship to another entity, such as an employee being allowed to report to a particular manager.
-
C.
reportsCertainActsTo
Indicates that one entity informs an authority or designated party about specific actions or incidents carried out by another entity.
-
D.
reportsAs
Indicates that one entity formally reports information, status, or results to another entity.
-
E.
reportedAs
Indicates that one entity has been formally reported or flagged to another entity, typically as problematic, suspicious, or noteworthy.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed31d8881908405da6c6d2f0463 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe5ec9028081909ae3d6fbe2f4cbbc |
completed | May 8, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe5e1d715881909fc516fafc707644 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 10:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fe5ec84910819094cb15269ace7c51 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.