Triple
T37639702
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Payatas |
E936580
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPublicIssue |
P136718
|
FINISHED |
| Object | solid waste management |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: solid waste management | Statement: [Payatas, hasPublicIssue, solid waste management]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPublicIssue Context triple: [Payatas, hasPublicIssue, solid waste management]
-
A.
hasRecentIssue
Indicates that an entity is associated with an issue or problem that has occurred within a recent or specified time frame.
-
B.
hasOngoingIssues
chosen
Indicates that an entity is currently experiencing unresolved or continuing problems or difficulties.
-
C.
hasIssueWith
Indicates that one entity experiences a problem, conflict, or concern related to another entity.
-
D.
hasNotableIssue
Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant problem, concern, or defect that is noteworthy or exceptional compared to typical cases.
-
E.
hasInternalIssue
Indicates that an entity is experiencing a problem, fault, or malfunction originating within itself or its internal components or processes.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed31d8881908405da6c6d2f0463 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fccdd496048190bca801a8a9eecb62 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcccee6240819084680887731ff64b |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.