Triple
T37622533
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marty Maraschino |
E936108
|
entity |
| Predicate | romanticallyFlirtsWith |
P140327
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Vince Fontaine |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Vince Fontaine | Statement: [Marty Maraschino, romanticallyFlirtsWith, Vince Fontaine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: romanticallyFlirtsWith Context triple: [Marty Maraschino, romanticallyFlirtsWith, Vince Fontaine]
-
A.
romanticallyObsessedWith
Indicates a strong, often overwhelming romantic fixation or preoccupation that one entity has toward another.
-
B.
romanticPattern
Indicates a recurring style, tendency, or structure in how romantic relationships or attractions develop or are expressed between entities.
-
C.
romanticFeeling
chosen
Indicates that one entity experiences romantic attraction or affection toward another entity.
-
D.
romanticRivalryWith
Indicates a mutual competitive relationship in which two entities vie for the romantic attention or affection of the same person.
-
E.
romanticMisunderstandingsWith
Indicates a situation where two entities experience confusion, misinterpretation, or mistaken beliefs about each other’s romantic feelings, intentions, or relationship status.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed16b748190ad6add183b1be688 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbaa1321b48190af92a3e7ec24ec5b |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fba8860f98819080b7bab05837b974 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.