Triple
T37611564
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | "Regenlied" Op. 59 No. 3 |
E935796
|
entity |
| Predicate | usedAsThematicMaterialIn |
P39719
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Violin Sonata No. 1 in G major, Op. 78 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Violin Sonata No. 1 in G major, Op. 78 | Statement: ["Regenlied" Op. 59 No. 3, usedAsThematicMaterialIn, Violin Sonata No. 1 in G major, Op. 78]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedAsThematicMaterialIn Context triple: ["Regenlied" Op. 59 No. 3, usedAsThematicMaterialIn, Violin Sonata No. 1 in G major, Op. 78]
-
A.
thematicMaterial
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary recurring idea, motif, or thematic content that is developed or referenced by another entity.
-
B.
thematicArea
Indicates the subject or item is associated with, or falls under, a particular thematic area or topic of focus.
-
C.
thematicTreatment
Indicates that one entity serves as the thematic focus, subject, or central topic treated, addressed, or explored by another entity.
-
D.
usedInMarketingMaterials
Indicates that something is included or featured as part of marketing or promotional materials.
-
E.
usedAsExampleIn
Indicates that one entity is cited or presented as an illustrative example within another entity, such as a text, discussion, or explanation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ed0a85481909254a8a89090c826 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff0d80c0dc81909fbd12285c7a45c0 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff0cd03e78819094895058f925fbfa |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:30 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.