Triple

T37608582
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ICPD+10 E935721 entity
Predicate approximateReviewYear P200933 FINISHED
Object 2004 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2004 | Statement: [ICPD+10, approximateReviewYear, 2004]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: approximateReviewYear
Context triple: [ICPD+10, approximateReviewYear, 2004]
  • A. approximateSettingYear
    Indicates the approximate calendar year in which the primary events or setting of something (e.g., a work or scenario) take place.
  • B. approximateProposalYear
    Indicates that one entity specifies an estimated or approximate year in which a proposal was made or put forward for the other entity.
  • C. retitleApproxYear
    Indicates that an entity was retitled or renamed around an approximate year, rather than at a precisely known date.
  • D. releaseApproximateYear
    Indicates that an entity was released or made available around a specified year, where the year is approximate rather than exact.
  • E. approximateDesignYear
    Indicates the estimated or inferred year in which something was designed, rather than a precisely known design year.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ed0a85481909254a8a89090c826 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffb97b8ff8819088b105d99a0820c9 completed May 9, 2026, 10:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffb88ef7388190a710120ed76edc0e completed May 9, 2026, 10:43 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ffb97ae1508190bf3addd6e2aac281 completed May 9, 2026, 10:47 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.