Triple

T37591598
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fausta Cornelia E935272 entity
Predicate marriageHasPoliticalSignificance P50599 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Fausta Cornelia, marriageHasPoliticalSignificance, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: marriageHasPoliticalSignificance
Context triple: [Fausta Cornelia, marriageHasPoliticalSignificance, true]
  • A. marriageSignificance
    Indicates the importance, impact, or meaningfulness that a marriage holds within a given context or for the entities involved.
  • B. marriageControversyInvolved
    Indicates that an entity is involved in a dispute, scandal, or public controversy related to a marriage.
  • C. politicalPurposeOfMarriage chosen
    Indicates that a marriage is entered into or used primarily for political objectives, such as gaining power, forming alliances, or influencing governance.
  • D. marriedToPolitician
    Indicates that a person is married to someone who holds or has held a political office or role.
  • E. regardsMarriageAs
    Indicates that one entity holds a particular view, attitude, or evaluative stance toward the institution or concept of marriage.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ecf39c081909baffe597bb55273 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe00dad1708190b6522476bebb43af completed May 8, 2026, 3:27 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdfc3717f48190bb50ac2919c8ef95 completed May 8, 2026, 3:07 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:18 p.m.