Triple
T3758290
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Fus’ha |
E82099
|
entity |
| Predicate | phonologyRelation |
P50775
|
FINISHED |
| Object | allows some regional variation in pronunciation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: allows some regional variation in pronunciation | Statement: [Fus’ha, phonologyRelation, allows some regional variation in pronunciation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: phonologyRelation Context triple: [Fus’ha, phonologyRelation, allows some regional variation in pronunciation]
-
A.
hasPhonologicalBasisFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the phonological source, motivation, or foundation for another entity.
-
B.
hasPhonologicalSimilarityTo
Indicates that two linguistic elements share similar sound patterns or phonological features.
-
C.
hasPhonologicalType
Indicates that one entity is characterized by or classified as having a particular phonological type (e.g., in terms of sound structure or phonological category).
-
D.
hasPhonologicalParameters
Indicates that an entity is associated with specific phonological features or parameters that characterize its sound structure.
-
E.
hasPhonotacticConstraint
Indicates that there is a restriction or rule governing which sound sequences or phoneme combinations are allowed in a given linguistic system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b1db40081908b61ffa6b78afd4d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adcbc04d348190b0e4a90d18bdd160 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adc04c851c8190ae5eaebf36df539b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69adc0fe3e3c8190bd886c7745c172a0 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:33 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:35 p.m.