Triple
T37578491
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | fueros |
E934888
|
entity |
| Predicate | preservedInPartIn |
P83097
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Navarre |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Navarre | Statement: [fueros, preservedInPartIn, Navarre]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: preservedInPartIn Context triple: [fueros, preservedInPartIn, Navarre]
-
A.
partlyPreservedAs
chosen
Indicates that an entity is only partially preserved or remains in incomplete form within another entity or context.
-
B.
preservedPart
Indicates that one entity is a remaining or conserved portion of another entity that has been kept intact over time.
-
C.
partiallyPreserved
Indicates that the referenced entity or object is only incompletely intact, with some parts missing, damaged, or lost while others remain.
-
D.
partiallyPreservedThrough
Indicates that something is not fully intact but has been maintained or conserved to some extent by or via another entity or medium.
-
E.
preservedWith
Indicates that one entity is kept intact, maintained, or protected by means of another entity used as a preservative or preservation method.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ecd99148190be327e391a70f5b6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd9ff026a48190bfec33deeb3b2c43 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 8:33 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd97d805bc8190ba12f429d3ad04c7 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 7:59 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.