Triple
T37566087
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Expedition 16 |
E933959
|
entity |
| Predicate | secondCommander |
P31581
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yuri Malenchenko |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yuri Malenchenko | Statement: [Expedition 16, secondCommander, Yuri Malenchenko]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: secondCommander Context triple: [Expedition 16, secondCommander, Yuri Malenchenko]
-
A.
sideCommander
Indicates that an entity serves as the commanding officer or leader in charge of a particular side or faction in a conflict, operation, or organization.
-
B.
rankOfSecondCommander
Indicates the rank held by the person serving as the second-in-command in a hierarchy or organization.
-
C.
commander
Indicates that one entity holds authoritative military or organizational control over another entity or group.
-
D.
commandersSide2
Indicates that an entity serves as the opposing or second side in a commander-versus-commander relationship or conflict.
-
E.
secondLeader
chosen
Indicates that an entity serves as the second-ranking leader or deputy leader in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ecb4acc8190b53f96d0b013e415 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff9a25407c81909faa86e72a7a9d17 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff99c613688190a03b2f93d5ccad2b |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:32 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.