Triple
T375631
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gonzales v. Raich |
E8365
|
entity |
| Predicate | stateLawContext |
P10245
|
FINISHED |
| Object | California medical marijuana law |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: California medical marijuana law | Statement: [Gonzales v. Raich, stateLawContext, California medical marijuana law]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stateLawContext Context triple: [Gonzales v. Raich, stateLawContext, California medical marijuana law]
-
A.
stateLawAtIssue
chosen
Indicates that a particular state law is the subject of dispute, analysis, or determination in a given legal context or case.
-
B.
legalJurisdiction
Indicates the legal authority or geographic area whose laws and courts have the power to govern, regulate, or adjudicate matters involving the related entities.
-
C.
legalContext
Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within, is shaped by, or is relevant to a specific legal framework, proceeding, or set of legal norms.
-
D.
legalSystem
Indicates the formal framework of laws, rules, and institutions that governs how legal matters are defined, interpreted, and enforced within a society or jurisdiction.
-
E.
statuteInvolved
Indicates that a particular statute or legal provision is implicated, referenced, or applied in relation to a given case, event, or legal matter.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7f2ec648190b42bc7db424f8109 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ec1585648190943f1c698e9b2d81 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e96216048190873ae533fa5b864d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.