Triple
T37534515
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hilary Farr |
E933157
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFacebook |
P112909
|
FINISHED |
| Object | https://www.facebook.com/hilaryfarrdesigns/ |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: https://www.facebook.com/hilaryfarrdesigns/ | Statement: [Hilary Farr, hasFacebook, https://www.facebook.com/hilaryfarrdesigns/]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFacebook Context triple: [Hilary Farr, hasFacebook, https://www.facebook.com/hilaryfarrdesigns/]
-
A.
hasFacebookAccount
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses or maintains a Facebook account.
-
B.
hasFBICooperation
Indicates that there is a cooperative or collaborative relationship with the FBI, typically involving information sharing, joint operations, or mutual assistance.
-
C.
hasSocialService
Indicates that an entity provides, offers, or is associated with a social service to another entity or community.
-
D.
hasOfficialSocialMedia
Indicates that an entity maintains an officially recognized social media account or profile.
-
E.
hasSocialNetworkingIntegration
Indicates that an entity is connected to or supports interaction with one or more social networking platforms.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ec999288190ae26ec7b6aea7046 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe96c2647c819082989f11e1ae3d35 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:06 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe928615448190af939e5a94be55bb |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:48 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.