Triple
T37521163
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tenth Satire of Juvenal |
E932775
|
entity |
| Predicate | proposesIdeal |
P188700
|
FINISHED |
| Object | moderation in desires |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: moderation in desires | Statement: [Tenth Satire of Juvenal, proposesIdeal, moderation in desires]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposesIdeal Context triple: [Tenth Satire of Juvenal, proposesIdeal, moderation in desires]
-
A.
proposes
Indicates that one entity formally suggests or puts forward an idea, plan, or course of action to another entity for consideration or approval.
-
B.
hasIdeal
Indicates that an entity holds or is associated with a guiding principle, standard, or value it considers perfect or most desirable.
-
C.
coreIdeal
Indicates that something is a fundamental, central principle or value that defines or strongly guides another entity.
-
D.
commendedFor
Indicates that one entity has expressed praise or approval toward another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or achievement.
-
E.
proposedRight
Indicates that one party has put forward or suggested granting a specific right to another party or entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ec730988190b5aa4f9cb9afd518 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbacaf54648190811ea33b34907e8e |
completed | May 6, 2026, 9:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fba883f770819091059c6f6c6af9f7 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fbacaea12c8190a4c99e64335f0e7e |
completed | May 6, 2026, 9:03 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.