Triple

T37486989
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Crew Expendable E931557 entity
Predicate hasDifficultyOptions P98685 FINISHED
Object Recruit LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Recruit | Statement: [Crew Expendable, hasDifficultyOptions, Recruit]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDifficultyOptions
Context triple: [Crew Expendable, hasDifficultyOptions, Recruit]
  • A. hasDifficultyContext
    Indicates that something’s difficulty is defined, interpreted, or constrained within a particular situational or contextual framework.
  • B. hasDifficultyClass
    Indicates that something (such as a task, challenge, or problem) is associated with a specific level of difficulty or complexity.
  • C. hasDifficultyDescription
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a textual description explaining its level or nature of difficulty.
  • D. hasDifficultyEffect
    Indicates that one entity causes a change in the difficulty level or challenge associated with another entity or activity.
  • E. difficultyOption chosen
    Indicates a relationship where a particular option specifies or represents a level of difficulty for something (e.g., a task, question, or activity).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ec382248190b47844df596123c6 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff9b1ad27081908f8a492396950795 completed May 9, 2026, 8:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff9a6354c48190ae21070c1424cb7a completed May 9, 2026, 8:34 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.