Triple
T37471474
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Spires of Ascension |
E931163
|
entity |
| Predicate | thematicCovenant |
P59157
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kyrian |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kyrian | Statement: [Spires of Ascension, thematicCovenant, Kyrian]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: thematicCovenant Context triple: [Spires of Ascension, thematicCovenant, Kyrian]
-
A.
covenantalTheme
chosen
Indicates a recurring, binding relational pattern or motif structured like a covenantal agreement between parties.
-
B.
CenterOfCovenant
Indicates that an entity serves as the primary focal point or core location around which a covenant or formal agreement is established or organized.
-
C.
signOfCovenant
Indicates that something serves as a visible or symbolic marker confirming the existence and terms of a covenant between parties.
-
D.
covenantWith
Indicates a formal, binding agreement or promise established between two or more parties.
-
E.
covenantView
Indicates a relationship where one party observes, understands, or interprets the terms, conditions, or implications of a covenant or binding agreement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ec2af148190897d101070d7f415 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb8e62aa348190af235cc01ca98b02 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 6:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb8d0c53c08190b64291bac58cdb4c |
completed | May 6, 2026, 6:48 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.