Triple
T37470651
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pelagos |
E931142
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSoulbindTree |
P189039
|
FINISHED |
| Object | combat traits |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: combat traits | Statement: [Pelagos, hasSoulbindTree, combat traits]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSoulbindTree Context triple: [Pelagos, hasSoulbindTree, combat traits]
-
A.
canSoulbindWith
Indicates that one entity is capable of forming a soulbound or spiritually bound connection with another entity.
-
B.
isSoulbindFor
Indicates that one entity is magically or spiritually bound to another in a way that links their fates or abilities.
-
C.
soulbindSystem
Indicates a game mechanic where a character permanently links an item, ability, or entity to themselves so it cannot be transferred or used by others.
-
D.
soulbindTreeType
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with, or categorized under, a specific type of soulbind tree.
-
E.
includesExampleSoulbindNPC
Indicates that something contains or features a specific example of a soulbound non-player character (NPC) as part of its content or configuration.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ec2af148190897d101070d7f415 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fde49a084081909d99b1e0258169d5 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fde1d04bd881909a46ecbbf18dfe59 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.