Triple
T37464500
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Twinspell |
E930999
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRarityVariants |
P189201
|
FINISHED |
| Object | common |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: common | Statement: [Twinspell, hasRarityVariants, common]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRarityVariants Context triple: [Twinspell, hasRarityVariants, common]
-
A.
hasVariantsIn
Indicates that an entity exists in multiple alternative forms or versions within a specified context or set.
-
B.
includesRarities
Indicates that one entity contains or encompasses specific rare or uncommon items, features, or elements associated with another entity.
-
C.
hasVariantSeries
Indicates a relationship where one entity is a variant or alternative series derived from or associated with another series.
-
D.
hasCommercialVariant
Indicates that an entity has a related version that is produced, marketed, or sold commercially.
-
E.
rarityPattern
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity follows a specific distribution or pattern of rarity across a set of items, instances, or conditions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ec1a1148190b0a961f188d621b0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe031bc6208190860099aef72d8dcb |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe014c8b388190b5d4e0cb95ee2be5 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:29 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.