Triple

T37459708
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tinkmaster Overspark (reprint-related theme) E930886 entity
Predicate hasLegendaryGem P179658 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Tinkmaster Overspark (reprint-related theme), hasLegendaryGem, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegendaryGem
Context triple: [Tinkmaster Overspark (reprint-related theme), hasLegendaryGem, true]
  • A. hasJewel chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is adorned with a jewel in relation to another entity.
  • B. isLegendaryForSet
    Indicates that an entity is classified as a legendary item specifically within the context of a given set or collection.
  • C. hasLegendsMaterial
    Indicates that something includes, references, or is composed of legendary or myth-based material.
  • D. hasLegendaryPokémon
    Indicates that an entity (such as a location, trainer, or group) possesses, contains, or is associated with at least one Legendary Pokémon.
  • E. isLegendaryStatus
    Indicates that an entity possesses a legendary status, typically signifying exceptional rarity, renown, or significance within a given context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ec1a1148190b0a961f188d621b0 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe87b609888190913b0c3f787ecdba completed May 9, 2026, 1:02 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe8731af48819092084f6f74bf052d completed May 9, 2026, 1 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.