Triple
T37456847
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Spore Crawler |
E930820
|
entity |
| Predicate | isStaticDefense |
P187865
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Spore Crawler, isStaticDefense, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isStaticDefense Context triple: [Spore Crawler, isStaticDefense, true]
-
A.
hasBaseDefense
Indicates that an entity possesses a specified level or value of defensive capability in its default or starting state.
-
B.
canBeDefendedIn
Indicates that something (such as a claim, action, or position) is capable of being justified or supported within a specified context, forum, or framework.
-
C.
isDefendedOn
Indicates that one entity provides protection, justification, or support for another entity in a specific context or situation.
-
D.
defensiveStructure
Indicates a relationship where one entity functions as a structure built or used to protect, defend, or fortify another entity or area.
-
E.
defenseStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of an entity’s defensive posture or protective readiness in a given context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ec1a1148190b0a961f188d621b0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb92efc5948190a040ba2028bab964 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 7:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb8d0b52588190bb29937a43b99b5e |
completed | May 6, 2026, 6:48 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fb92ee27408190b0116ef2d789abac |
completed | May 6, 2026, 7:13 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.