Triple

T3744747
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Banker's algorithm E79782 entity
Predicate exampleUsedIn P41975 FINISHED
Object resource allocation problems in textbooks LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: resource allocation problems in textbooks | Statement: [Banker's algorithm, exampleUsedIn, resource allocation problems in textbooks]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exampleUsedIn
Context triple: [Banker's algorithm, exampleUsedIn, resource allocation problems in textbooks]
  • A. usedAsExampleIn chosen
    Indicates that one entity is cited or presented as an illustrative example within another entity, such as a text, discussion, or explanation.
  • B. areUsedIn
    Indicates that certain entities serve as components, tools, or resources within a particular process, context, or application.
  • C. alsoUsedIn
    Indicates that something is additionally employed, applied, or present in another context, setting, or use case beyond the primary one.
  • D. usedOn
    Indicates that one entity is applied to, operated on, or otherwise utilized in relation to another entity.
  • E. widelyUsedIn
    Indicates that something is commonly or extensively utilized within a particular context, domain, or group.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b115610819095b02007da5ca3cb completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adcb58c9048190a055d1f4a7e6b699 completed March 8, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adc04adebc819088d7f36d0ac343a6 completed March 8, 2026, 6:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:34 p.m.