Triple
T3743249
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Family purity laws |
E79748
|
entity |
| Predicate | categoryWithinHalakha |
P17761
|
FINISHED |
| Object | laws of family life |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: laws of family life | Statement: [Family purity laws, categoryWithinHalakha, laws of family life]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: categoryWithinHalakha Context triple: [Family purity laws, categoryWithinHalakha, laws of family life]
-
A.
halachicCategory
chosen
Indicates the classification of something according to Jewish legal (halachic) categories or rulings.
-
B.
halachicNote
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a halachic (Jewish legal) note, comment, or annotation providing legal clarification or guidance about another entity.
-
C.
halakhicDebate
Indicates a formal religious-legal dispute or discussion over the correct interpretation or application of Jewish law between parties.
-
D.
halakhicStatus
Indicates the formal standing or classification of an entity according to Jewish law (halakha), especially in terms of what is religiously permitted, required, or prohibited.
-
E.
viewsHalakhaAs
Indicates that one entity regards or interprets Halakha (Jewish law) in a particular way, such as considering it authoritative, binding, flexible, or symbolic.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b115610819095b02007da5ca3cb |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adcb576b5881908515d64c71f11a16 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adc048f28c819092bed16a95a3cac1 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:34 p.m.