Triple

T37411165
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Geraldton–Mount Magnet Road E929572 entity
Predicate hasInlandEndpoint P203046 FINISHED
Object Mount Magnet NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mount Magnet | Statement: [Geraldton–Mount Magnet Road, hasInlandEndpoint, Mount Magnet]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInlandEndpoint
Context triple: [Geraldton–Mount Magnet Road, hasInlandEndpoint, Mount Magnet]
  • A. isInlandPort
    Indicates that a port facility is located inland, away from the open sea, typically on a river, canal, or lake, while still serving maritime or shipping functions.
  • B. hasEndpointLocation
    Indicates that something has a specific location at which it terminates or reaches its end point.
  • C. hasEndpointCountry
    Indicates that an entity such as a route, connection, or infrastructure element terminates or has an endpoint located in a specified country.
  • D. hasInlandCity
    Indicates that one entity has, contains, or is associated with a city located inland (away from the coast or major bodies of water).
  • E. hasEndpointCity
    Indicates that a route, connection, or path terminates at a particular city as one of its endpoints.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ebde49481908566cd96b37ccc84 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a01185c46f0819089b4a2ad3c3e2f33 completed May 10, 2026, 11:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0117e19e008190870663dd45084416 completed May 10, 2026, 11:42 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a01185b580c8190a01f65404486cfec completed May 10, 2026, 11:44 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:16 p.m.