Triple
T37407768
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Al-Muhaymin |
E929177
|
entity |
| Predicate | inspiresConcept |
P29525
|
FINISHED |
| Object | trust in divine care |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: trust in divine care | Statement: [Al-Muhaymin, inspiresConcept, trust in divine care]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inspiresConcept Context triple: [Al-Muhaymin, inspiresConcept, trust in divine care]
-
A.
inspirationConcept
chosen
Indicates that one concept serves as a source of inspiration or creative influence for another concept.
-
B.
themeInspiration
Indicates that one entity serves as the creative source or conceptual basis that inspires or shapes the theme expressed in another entity.
-
C.
featuredConcept
Indicates that one concept is highlighted or given special prominence relative to others in a particular context.
-
D.
inspiredUse
Indicates that one entity’s use, creation, or implementation of something was motivated or influenced by another entity or source.
-
E.
designInspirationFor
Indicates that one entity serves as a creative or conceptual source that influences or shapes the design of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ebbf79c8190b85bbcf3a6be57e4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd864235b481908738dbb69556bc62 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd8373b6bc819091c554f29ee17fec |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:16 p.m.