Triple
T37384704
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Stanley Cup 2010 |
E928535
|
entity |
| Predicate | runnerUpGeneralManager |
P188020
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Paul Holmgren |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Paul Holmgren | Statement: [Stanley Cup 2010, runnerUpGeneralManager, Paul Holmgren]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: runnerUpGeneralManager Context triple: [Stanley Cup 2010, runnerUpGeneralManager, Paul Holmgren]
-
A.
runnerUpHeadCoach
Indicates that a coach served as the head coach of a team that finished as the runner-up in a competition or season.
-
B.
runnerUp
Indicates that one entity finished in second place relative to another in a competition or ranking.
-
C.
runnerUpKeyPlayer
Indicates that an entity is a key player who finished as the runner-up in a competition or ranking.
-
D.
runnerUpManager
Indicates that one entity serves as the manager or coach of another entity who finished as the runner-up in a competition or ranking.
-
E.
runnerUpWins
Indicates that an entity finishes in second place in a competition or ranking and receives the corresponding runner-up victory or award.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eb9e66881908534cf22d04c3b5a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb9e1845e881908d19158440cf3b87 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb8d08d6988190a00794ac26078348 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 6:48 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fb9e173f348190b7ab5935e4dca039 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 8:01 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:16 p.m.