Triple
T37379967
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Quran 60:10 |
E928405
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalRulingOn |
P201504
|
FINISHED |
| Object | returning believing migrant women to disbelieving husbands |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: returning believing migrant women to disbelieving husbands | Statement: [Quran 60:10, legalRulingOn, returning believing migrant women to disbelieving husbands]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalRulingOn Context triple: [Quran 60:10, legalRulingOn, returning believing migrant women to disbelieving husbands]
-
A.
legalRulingNature
Indicates the type or character of a legal ruling, such as its form, basis, or procedural nature.
-
B.
laysDownRulingOn
Indicates that an authority formally issues or establishes a decision, judgment, or rule concerning a particular matter or case.
-
C.
constitutionalRuling
Indicates a formal judicial decision determining whether a law, policy, or government action complies with a constitution.
-
D.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
E.
legalDoctrineConfirmed
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine has been formally upheld, validated, or reaffirmed by an authoritative legal decision or body.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eb9e66881908534cf22d04c3b5a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fffbb5d0188190b6d168de8626ff68 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fffa3bc1208190a277961385a4789f |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:23 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fffbb513c881909063ecf12467f4a6 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:29 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:16 p.m.