Triple
T37347442
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Renfrewshire South |
E927216
|
entity |
| Predicate | currentMsp |
P200836
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tom Arthur |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tom Arthur | Statement: [Renfrewshire South, currentMsp, Tom Arthur]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: currentMsp Context triple: [Renfrewshire South, currentMsp, Tom Arthur]
-
A.
currentMSP
Indicates that an entity is the managed service provider (MSP) that is currently active or in effect for another entity.
-
B.
hasMSP
Indicates that one entity possesses, is associated with, or is served by a specific Managed Service Provider (MSP).
-
C.
currentMP
Indicates that the subject is the person who currently serves as a Member of Parliament representing the object’s constituency or jurisdiction.
-
D.
mpcNumber
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific MPC (Manufacturer Part Code or similar standardized catalog) identification number.
-
E.
currentMPChamber
Indicates that the subject is currently serving as a Member of Parliament in the specified parliamentary chamber.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eb5e034819088e53ab5b7909a68 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ffb1218cb08190a814c7f0833501a7 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ffb083d6988190b2757e0cfd629b75 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:09 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ffb120b9988190b6361c69265033c0 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:11 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:16 p.m.