Triple
T373060
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Articles of Confederation |
E8310
|
entity |
| Predicate | coinagePower |
P11786
|
FINISHED |
| Object | granted to Congress |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: granted to Congress | Statement: [Articles of Confederation, coinagePower, granted to Congress]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coinagePower Context triple: [Articles of Confederation, coinagePower, granted to Congress]
-
A.
coinDenomination
Indicates the specific monetary value assigned to a coin within a currency system.
-
B.
authorizedCoinMetal
Indicates that a particular metal is officially approved for use in minting a given coin.
-
C.
coinedIn
Indicates that something (typically a term, phrase, or name) was first created or introduced at a particular time or in a particular place.
-
D.
mint
Indicates the act of creating or issuing something new, typically in an official or authoritative capacity (such as producing new currency or tokens).
-
E.
coinDenominationsInclude
Indicates that a set of coin denominations contains a particular denomination as one of its members.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7f2ec648190b42bc7db424f8109 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ec018d508190b5687a9ba90b3092 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e960d880819084b3df4e5137a1e2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ea0b23ec8190bef9d593162388a4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.