Triple

T37305688
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sun of Justice E926072 entity
Predicate hasMetaphoricalDomain P155063 FINISHED
Object sun LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sun | Statement: [Sun of Justice, hasMetaphoricalDomain, sun]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMetaphoricalDomain
Context triple: [Sun of Justice, hasMetaphoricalDomain, sun]
  • A. hasMetaphoricalForm
    Indicates that one entity is expressed, represented, or understood through a metaphorical form or figurative expression involving another entity.
  • B. hasMetaphoricalSubject chosen
    Indicates that one entity functions as the metaphorical subject or source domain in a figurative or metaphorical expression involving another entity.
  • C. hasMetaphoricalContent
    Indicates that something contains or expresses meaning through metaphorical, rather than purely literal, content.
  • D. hasMetaphoricalFramework
    Indicates that one entity employs or is structured around a metaphorical framework derived from or associated with another entity.
  • E. hasMetaphorType
    Indicates that one entity is classified as having or using a particular type of metaphor in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eb1bc508190924e9fa5d8acdeb3 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff878f41888190bcb3bc41ad26081a completed May 9, 2026, 7:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff854082d88190aad3bfedf05e849f completed May 9, 2026, 7:04 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:16 p.m.