Triple
T373054
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Articles of Confederation |
E8310
|
entity |
| Predicate | taxationPowerOfCongress |
P11783
|
FINISHED |
| Object | none |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: none | Statement: [Articles of Confederation, taxationPowerOfCongress, none]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: taxationPowerOfCongress Context triple: [Articles of Confederation, taxationPowerOfCongress, none]
-
A.
constitutionalFunction
Indicates that an entity serves a role, duty, or purpose as defined or required by a constitution or foundational governing framework.
-
B.
constitutionalCategory
Indicates the classification of something according to its constitutional or structural type or category.
-
C.
constitutionalNumber
Indicates that an entity has a specific number or count defined or constrained by a constitution or foundational governing document.
-
D.
constitutionalContext
Indicates that something occurs, is interpreted, or is evaluated within the framework, principles, or provisions of a constitution.
-
E.
supremacyClause
Indicates that one legal authority, rule, or agreement takes precedence over and invalidates conflicting lower-level laws or provisions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e7f2ec648190b42bc7db424f8109 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:04 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ec018d508190b5687a9ba90b3092 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e960d880819084b3df4e5137a1e2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2ea0b23ec8190bef9d593162388a4 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:08 p.m.