Triple

T37300936
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Houston–Dallas E925937 entity
Predicate hasPlannedOperatorCandidate P141921 FINISHED
Object Texas Central Partners NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Texas Central Partners | Statement: [Houston–Dallas, hasPlannedOperatorCandidate, Texas Central Partners]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPlannedOperatorCandidate
Context triple: [Houston–Dallas, hasPlannedOperatorCandidate, Texas Central Partners]
  • A. hasPlannedOperator chosen
    Indicates that an entity has a designated operator who is planned or scheduled to perform an operation or service for it.
  • B. hasPlannedOperatorType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific type of operator that is intended or scheduled to perform an operation or service.
  • C. hasPlannedPart
    Indicates that one entity includes another entity as a component or segment within a planned or scheduled whole.
  • D. hasPlanner
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or assigned a planner responsible for organizing or managing its activities or processes.
  • E. hasPlannedOwner
    Indicates that an entity is intended or scheduled to become the owner of another entity in the future.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eb1bc508190924e9fa5d8acdeb3 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe5ec9028081909ae3d6fbe2f4cbbc completed May 8, 2026, 10:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe5e1d715881909fc516fafc707644 completed May 8, 2026, 10:05 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:16 p.m.