Triple
T37291084
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ControlLogix |
E925666
|
entity |
| Predicate | previouslyProgrammedWith |
P31541
|
FINISHED |
| Object | RSLogix 5000 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RSLogix 5000 | Statement: [ControlLogix, previouslyProgrammedWith, RSLogix 5000]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: previouslyProgrammedWith Context triple: [ControlLogix, previouslyProgrammedWith, RSLogix 5000]
-
A.
isProgrammedIn
Indicates that a software system, application, or component is implemented using a particular programming language.
-
B.
programmedVia
chosen
Indicates that one entity is created, configured, or made to operate through the use of another entity as its programming method, tool, or medium.
-
C.
laterUsedForProgram
Indicates that something is subsequently utilized as part of, or as input to, a program or programming process.
-
D.
formerProgram
Indicates that an entity previously held the role or status of a program but no longer does so.
-
E.
reprogrammedBy
Indicates that an entity’s original programming or code has been altered or replaced by another specified agent or process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eb0f86c819098dee07393e69ec3 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ffc7b4c7f88190b6357a44e7f0940f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ffc755f09c8190995ca00d97336988 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:16 p.m.