Triple
T3727815
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cistercian reform |
E78990
|
entity |
| Predicate | architecturalPrinciple |
P1757
|
FINISHED |
| Object | avoidance of figurative decoration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: avoidance of figurative decoration | Statement: [Cistercian reform, architecturalPrinciple, avoidance of figurative decoration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: architecturalPrinciple Context triple: [Cistercian reform, architecturalPrinciple, avoidance of figurative decoration]
-
A.
architecturalConcept
Indicates that one entity represents or embodies an architectural concept in relation to another entity.
-
B.
typeOfPrinciples
Indicates a relationship where one entity specifies the kind or category of principles that another entity embodies, uses, or is governed by.
-
C.
implementsPrinciple
Indicates that an entity applies, follows, or puts into practice a specified principle in its design, behavior, or operation.
-
D.
usesPrinciple
chosen
Indicates that one entity applies, relies on, or is based upon a particular principle in its functioning, reasoning, or design.
-
E.
architecturalIntegrity
Indicates that an entity maintains the coherence, stability, and consistency of its overall structural or design framework without compromising essential components or principles.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b0e4650819090ad7cef094285e8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adcaf921bc81908bb347d6b9204670 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adc0452f5081909c79e114a86cce8c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:34 p.m.