Triple
T37276557
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Christ and Culture Revisited |
E924662
|
entity |
| Predicate | critiquesAuthor |
P187686
|
FINISHED |
| Object | H. Richard Niebuhr |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: H. Richard Niebuhr | Statement: [Christ and Culture Revisited, critiquesAuthor, H. Richard Niebuhr]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: critiquesAuthor Context triple: [Christ and Culture Revisited, critiquesAuthor, H. Richard Niebuhr]
-
A.
typeOfCriticism
Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of criticism directed at another entity or subject.
-
B.
critiquesConcept
Indicates that one entity analyzes, evaluates, or challenges the ideas or principles represented by another entity.
-
C.
authorOfCriticalReception
Indicates that an entity is the author or creator of a critical review, evaluation, or reception of another work or subject.
-
D.
famousCritique
Indicates that one entity is a well-known critical assessment, review, or commentary about another entity.
-
E.
aimsToCritique
Indicates an intention to analyze and point out faults, limitations, or weaknesses in something.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eacdd8c819094080d3991e6d37c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb78cbef988190b8f79d946b46e6b2 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb5a9ac5a08190b24ef308963fc52b |
completed | May 6, 2026, 3:13 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fb78c982ac8190846efe8f6209e5d1 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:16 p.m.