Triple
T37272801
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rancho Cotate |
E924558
|
entity |
| Predicate | jurisdictionAfterAnnexation |
P18056
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sonoma County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sonoma County | Statement: [Rancho Cotate, jurisdictionAfterAnnexation, Sonoma County]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: jurisdictionAfterAnnexation Context triple: [Rancho Cotate, jurisdictionAfterAnnexation, Sonoma County]
-
A.
statusAfterAnnexation
Indicates the legal or political condition an entity holds following its annexation by another entity.
-
B.
residenceAfterAnnexation
Indicates that an entity’s place of residence is located in a territory after that territory has been annexed by another political authority.
-
C.
laterLegalJurisdiction
chosen
Indicates that one legal jurisdiction succeeds or replaces another jurisdiction at a later point in time.
-
D.
positionOnAnnexation
Indicates a stance or viewpoint that an entity holds regarding the act or policy of annexing a territory or region.
-
E.
partialAnnexationBy
Indicates a relationship where one entity has annexed or incorporated only a portion of another entity’s territory, authority, or structure, rather than taking it over in full.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eacdd8c819094080d3991e6d37c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb78cbef988190b8f79d946b46e6b2 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb5a9ac5a08190b24ef308963fc52b |
completed | May 6, 2026, 3:13 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.