Triple
T37268603
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Springer Softail |
E924452
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCustomizationPotential |
P197076
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high | Statement: [Springer Softail, hasCustomizationPotential, high]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCustomizationPotential Context triple: [Springer Softail, hasCustomizationPotential, high]
-
A.
haveCustom
Indicates that one entity possesses, uses, or is associated with a non-standard or specially tailored version of another entity.
-
B.
hasCustomizationArea
Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a specific area or section dedicated to customization or configuration.
-
C.
customizableBy
Indicates that one entity can be modified, configured, or tailored in some way by another entity.
-
D.
customizableWith
Indicates that one entity can be modified, configured, or tailored in some way using another entity.
-
E.
hasCustomizationGroup
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific customization group that defines configurable options or variations for it.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eacdd8c819094080d3991e6d37c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe766490c081908c49c8cc07d0ae9b |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe75bb5f4481908572a5ffcbdc5154 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:46 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fe7663b5bc81909524c40d3a172512 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 11:48 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.