Triple

T37237017
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ITU-T G series E923610 entity
Predicate usesRecommendationPrefix P188506 FINISHED
Object G. LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: G. | Statement: [ITU-T G series, usesRecommendationPrefix, G.]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesRecommendationPrefix
Context triple: [ITU-T G series, usesRecommendationPrefix, G.]
  • A. recommendsUseOf
    Indicates that one entity advises, endorses, or suggests the use of another entity as appropriate or beneficial in a given context.
  • B. implementsRecommendationOf
    Indicates that one entity carries out or puts into practice a recommendation that was proposed or issued by another entity.
  • C. recommendedIn
    Indicates that one entity is suggested or endorsed within the context, content, or scope of another entity (such as a document, list, or recommendation source).
  • D. isOftenRecommendedBy
    Indicates that one entity is frequently suggested or endorsed by another as a preferred or suitable choice.
  • E. commendedFor
    Indicates that one entity has expressed praise or approval toward another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or achievement.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ea9fee88190a589f661d95a7189 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fba78aca4c8190b8f1831e8cc04e06 completed May 6, 2026, 8:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fba34a65a4819088bac6c17542d71c completed May 6, 2026, 8:23 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fba789c1188190973a919bfe2871f3 completed May 6, 2026, 8:41 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.