Triple
T37236231
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mumuye–Yendang languages |
E923582
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Adamawa language group |
C62787
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Adamawa language group Context triple: [Mumuye–Yendang languages, instanceOf, Adamawa language group]
-
A.
Volta–Niger language
A Volta–Niger language is a member of a proposed branch of the Niger–Congo language family spoken primarily in southern Nigeria and neighboring regions, characterized by significant lexical and grammatical diversity among its constituent languages.
-
B.
Grassfields language subgroup
The Grassfields language subgroup is a branch of the Southern Bantoid languages spoken primarily in the Grassfields region of western Cameroon, characterized by significant internal diversity and complex noun class systems.
-
C.
Igbo subgroup
An Igbo subgroup is a distinct cultural, linguistic, and often geographically based division within the broader Igbo ethnic group, characterized by shared traditions, dialects, and social identities.
-
D.
Nilotic language
A Nilotic language is a member of a group of related languages spoken primarily along the Nile Valley and surrounding regions of East Africa, characterized by shared grammatical and phonological features.
-
E.
Nilotic language
A Nilotic language is a member of a group of related languages spoken primarily along the Nile Valley and surrounding regions of East Africa, characterized by shared grammatical structures and vocabulary.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ea9fee88190a589f661d95a7189 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.