Triple
T37229615
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cogswell Cogs |
E923094
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRivalExecutive |
P193975
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mr. Spacely |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mr. Spacely | Statement: [Cogswell Cogs, hasRivalExecutive, Mr. Spacely]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRivalExecutive Context triple: [Cogswell Cogs, hasRivalExecutive, Mr. Spacely]
-
A.
hasInfluentialExecutive
Indicates that an entity has an executive whose decisions or position significantly affect the entity’s direction, performance, or impact.
-
B.
hasRivalState
Indicates that one state maintains a rivalry or competitive opposition with another state.
-
C.
hasForeignRival
Indicates that an entity has at least one rival that is based in or originates from a different country or foreign jurisdiction.
-
D.
politicalRivalOf
Indicates a relationship in which two political actors or groups compete against or oppose each other for power, influence, or office.
-
E.
hasRivalNewspaperOwner
Indicates that one newspaper owner stands in a rivalry relationship with another newspaper owner.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ea7f0008190b31b8e30f3d05a71 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd5bf69acc819092a01e4259785dc3 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd59b3f4ac8190a7f9dd3142da6e09 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:34 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd5bf49288819098a12202411cba4f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 3:43 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.